Score any public Git repo for AI-pattern signals and maintainability. Heuristic proxies only — not proof of AI authorship.
📸 Static sample league. The scorer above is live — it clones and scores any public repo via the /api/score endpoint.
The table below is a pre-generated snapshot; regenerate it locally with the
vibe-coding-detector CLI.
Scores are deterministic from source + git history.
| # | Repo | AI-pattern | Band | Maintainability | LOC | Commits |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OthersideAI/self-operating-computer | 31.8 | Some scaffold/AI-pattern signals | 64.5 | 2,047 | 500 |
| 2 | psf/requests | 27.5 | Some scaffold/AI-pattern signals | 86.0 | 9,812 | 500 |
| 3 | vercel/next-learn | 27.3 | Some scaffold/AI-pattern signals | 60.4 | 6,510 | 224 |
| 4 | pallets/flask | 26.3 | Some scaffold/AI-pattern signals | 86.0 | 14,081 | 500 |
| 5 | pallets/click | 26.0 | Some scaffold/AI-pattern signals | 86.0 | 21,484 | 500 |
| 6 | tiangolo/full-stack-fastapi-template | 23.8 | Mostly human-shaped | 90.4 | 11,071 | 500 |
| 7 | httpie/cli | 17.9 | Mostly human-shaped | 96.0 | 15,678 | 500 |
| 8 | psf/black | 1.9 | Mostly human-shaped | 87.2 | 123,724 | 500 |
Methodology: comment-narration density, placeholder/TODO density, identifier genericness, structural duplication, and commit burstiness (big-bang first commit / sparse history / minute-bursts). Maintainability is independent: cyclomatic complexity, function length, test presence, comment balance. All signals are deterministic from the source + git history. Built with vibe-coding-detector — live at Vercel.